rbxii3/firmware
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/meshtastic/firmware.git synced 2025-12-22 02:32:23 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

sx1262 better to check for header because preamble might never result in irq

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Kevin Hester
2020-10-08 06:23:05 +08:00
parent bdcd5c3981
commit 1a3cc40c7e
3 changed files with 16 additions and 8 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
src/mesh/SX1262Interface.cpp
View File

@@ -179,16 +179,18 @@ void SX1262Interface::startReceive()
/** Could we send right now (i.e. either not actively receving or transmitting)? */
bool SX1262Interface::isActivelyReceiving()
{
// The IRQ status will be cleared when we start our read operation. Check if we've started a preamble, but haven't yet
// The IRQ status will be cleared when we start our read operation. Check if we've started a header, but haven't yet
// received and handled the interrupt for reading the packet/handling errors.
// FIXME: it would be better to check for preamble, but we currently have our ISR not set to fire for packets that
// never even get a valid header, so we don't want preamble to get set and stay set due to noise on the network.
uint16_t irq = lora.getIrqStatus();
bool hasPreamble = (irq & SX126X_IRQ_PREAMBLE_DETECTED);
bool hasPreamble = (irq & SX126X_IRQ_HEADER_VALID);
// this is not correct - often always true - need to add an extra conditional
// size_t bytesPending = lora.getPacketLength();
// if (hasPreamble || bytesPending) DEBUG_MSG("rx hasPre %d, bytes %d\n", hasPreamble, bytesPending);
// if (hasPreamble) DEBUG_MSG("rx hasPreamble\n");
return hasPreamble;
}