rbxii3/firmware
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/meshtastic/firmware.git synced 2025-12-20 01:32:40 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #1998 from GUVWAF/dutyCycleLimit

Browse Source 
Completely refrain from transmitting if duty cycle limit exceeded
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Göttgens
2022-11-29 11:06:31 +01:00
committed by GitHub
parent f3c5a01daf 7ca104cef6
commit 0dff05e881
9 changed files with 45 additions and 7 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

13
src/mesh/Router.cpp
View File

@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
#include "Channels.h"
#include "CryptoEngine.h"
#include "NodeDB.h"
#include "MeshRadio.h"
#include "RTC.h"
#include "configuration.h"
#include "main.h"
@@ -187,6 +188,18 @@ ErrorCode Router::send(MeshPacket *p)
{
assert(p->to != nodeDB.getNodeNum()); // should have already been handled by sendLocal
// Abort sending if we are violating the duty cycle
if (!config.lora.override_duty_cycle && myRegion->dutyCycle != 100) {
float hourlyTxPercent = airTime->utilizationTXPercent();
if (hourlyTxPercent > myRegion->dutyCycle) {
uint8_t silentMinutes = airTime->getSilentMinutes(hourlyTxPercent, myRegion->dutyCycle);
DEBUG_MSG("WARNING: Duty cycle limit exceeded. Aborting send for now, you can send again in %d minutes.\n", silentMinutes);
Routing_Error err = Routing_Error_DUTY_CYCLE_LIMIT;
abortSendAndNak(err, p);
return err;
}
}
// PacketId nakId = p->decoded.which_ackVariant == SubPacket_fail_id_tag ? p->decoded.ackVariant.fail_id : 0;
// assert(!nakId); // I don't think we ever send 0hop naks over the wire (other than to the phone), test that assumption with
// assert